EN PL
The executive agency as a legal organisational form of implementing cybersecurity tasks
 
More details
Hide details
1
Chair of Administrative Law and Security Studies, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
 
 
Publication date: 2023-02-20
 
 
Cybersecurity and Law 2023;9(1):48-60
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The national cybersecurity system is formed of a number of public entities, including executive agencies with legal personality as entities of the public finance sector. The executive agency could implement cybersecurity tasks important to the functioning of the state and its institutions. Through this legal organisational form, it would be possible to shape the development of new technologies that could then serve a digital society or digital state, including the protection of ICT systems for communication, as well as the provision of digital services and key services. Due to the widespread activity in cyberspace, it is necessary to have entities in place to protect its users. Such an entity could have the form of a cyber agency, working with other institutions (public and private), that is competent for cybersecurity
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz K., Karpiuk M., Kostrubiec J., The legal status of public entities in the field of cybersecurity in Poland, Maribor 2021.
 
2.
Czuryk M., Cybersecurity as a premise to introduce a state of exception, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2021, no. 2.
 
3.
Czuryk M., Special rules of remuneration for individuals performing cybersecurity tasks, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 2.
 
4.
Czuryk M., Supporting the development of telecommunications services and networks through local and regional government bodies, and cybersecurity, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 2.
 
5.
Hoffman I., Cseh K.B., E-administration, cybersecurity and municipalities – the challenges of cybersecurity issues for the municipalities in Hungary, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2020, no. 2.
 
6.
Hoffman I., Karpiuk M., The local self-government’s place in the cybersecurity domain. Examples of Poland and Hungary, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 1.
 
7.
Kaczmarek K., Zapobieganie zagrożeniom cyfrowym na przykładzie Republiki Estońskiej i Republiki Finlandii, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 1.
 
8.
Karpiuk M., Activities of the local government units in the field of telecommunications, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 1.
 
9.
Karpiuk M., Cybersecurity as an element in the planning activities of public administration, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2021, no. 1.
 
10.
Karpiuk M., Tasks of the Minister of National Defence in the area of cybersecurity, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 1.
 
11.
Karpiuk M., The obligations of public entities within the national cybersecurity system, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2020, no. 2.
 
12.
Kosikowski C., Ustawa o finansach publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2011.
 
13.
Lipiec-Warzecha L., Ustawa o finansach publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2011.
 
14.
Marchewka-Bartkowiak K., Agencje wykonawcze, „Infos” 2011, no. 19.
 
15.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland, Warszawa 2020.
 
16.
Ustawa o finansach publicznych. Komentarz, ed. Z. Ofiarski, Warszawa 2020.
 
ISSN:2658-1493
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top